Sunday, March 06, 2011

USAID wants you to go thirsty in a world of water to keep their jobs and steal

USAID is widely known to be a CIA front responsible for implementing policies that impact innocent people and that further their power and monetary goals. Barry Soetoro's mother worked for USAID. Working with the Ford Foundation under Peter Geithner wasn't much of an improvement.

President Barack Obama's mother, Ann Dunham Sutoro, spent more than 20 years in Indonesia working on a range of development tasks for USAID, the Ford Foundation, the World Bank, and other organizations.

She was an early pioneer in providing microcredits to the poor, and helped bring education to poor children and adults. She also worked to preserve ancient village crafts and improve the lives of women...


Sutoro taught English for a development group supported by USAID—the Lembaga Pendidikan Pembinaan Manajemen—which still exists but no longer receives U.S. assistance, said Ikranagara.


Alex Jones carried this analysis involving USAID on Saturday.

...the world is facing some very serious problems when it comes to water. Due to the greed of the global elite, there is not nearly enough fresh water to go around. The following are some very disturbing facts about the global water situation….

*Worldwide demand for fresh water tripled during the last century, and is now doubling every 21 years.

*According to USAID, one-third of all humans will face severe or chronic water shortages by the year 2025.

*Of the 60 million people added to the world’s cities every year, the vast majority of them live in impoverished slums and shanty-towns with no sanitation facilities whatsoever.

*It is estimated that 75 percent of India’s surface water is now contaminated by human and agricultural waste.

*Not only that, but according to a UN study on sanitation, far more people in India have access to a mobile phone than to a toilet.

*In northern China, the water table is dropping one meter per year due to overpumping.

These days, one of the trendy things to do is to call water “the oil of the 21st century”, but unfortunately that is not a completely inaccurate statement. Fresh, clean water is something that we all need, but right now world supplies are getting tight.

Our politicians and the global elite could be doing something about this if they really wanted to, but right now they seem perfectly fine with what is happening.

Well of course they're going to do nothing ! The longer they wait, the more difficulty they will cause in order to fulfill their own sham prophecy and cost the servile countries more money to fix what they cause by waiting until they've created a crisis. Do you think they're going to go around building water facilities that our Roman Empire mastered using rocks, stucco and wood 2000 years ago ?

If USAID was so worried about feeding and hydrating the world, they'd be building desalination plants and stop enabling fairly high ranking staffers' brothers from harassing two maimed people !

Instead they're worried about bureaucratic drivel like making countries obey their policies.

The Agency is working towards that goal. The fundamental role of the Agency in the water sector is to promote the use of integrated approaches to water resources management worldwide by providing technical and managerial assistance, education and outreach opportunities, and international leadership through both USAID and other donor programs.

and

USAID investments and activities in technical capacity building and good governance and finance practices for the water sector successfully catalyze alliances and partnerships capable of leveraging significant sums of money to fund large scale water delivery and wastewater treatment systems.

Unfortunately some of this post that Jones carried was foundational propaganda from USAID itself found here from discussions of the up and coming organized government theft ring, that of water. It even includes burgeoning threats of war from left wingers who only have a use for soldiers when they do their bidding and who are more concerned about a $60,000 Toyota Prius that gets worse mileage than a Honda Accord. And the Prius destroys towns through nickel mining and battery manufacture, as seen in this oft repeated editorial from Central Connecticut State University:

Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the ‘dead zone’ around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles...

All of this would be bad enough in and of itself; however, the journey to make a hybrid doesn’t end there. The nickel produced by this disastrous plant is shipped via massive container ship to the largest nickel refinery in Europe. From there, the nickel hops over to China to produce ‘nickel foam.’ From there, it goes to Japan. Finally, the completed batteries are shipped to the United States, finalizing the around-the-world trip required to produce a single Prius battery. Are these not sounding less and less like environmentally sound cars and more like a farce?

So please spare us these self aggrandizing sham claims, USAID / CIA leftists:

The world faces an unprecedented crisis in water resources management, with profound implications for global food security, protection of human health, and maintenance of aquatic ecosystems. Water shortages threaten to reduce global food supply, while the world’s population grows by 80 million people each year. With current trends, by 2025, one-third of all humans will face severe and chronic water shortages. Industrialization, irrigated agriculture, massive urbanization, rising standards of living, and, of course, more people are pushing the demand for freshwater to new heights, undermining already fragile water security for many nations.

Water security is an elusive concept, but consensus is beginning to emerge in the world community as to its dimensions, its parameters, and the best approaches for its achievement. As endorsed by the Second World Water Forum Ministerial Declaration (2000), water security simultaneously considers the need for human access to safe and affordable water for health and well-being, the assurance of economic and political stability, the protection of human populations from the risks of water-related hazards, the equitable and cooperative sharing of water resources, the complete and fair valuation of the resource, and the sustainability of ecosystems at all parts of the hydrologic cycle.


The water crisis is not one of absolute scarcity as much as poor management and inequitable distribution. Regardless of the cause, some regions require particularly urgent action. Of the 48 countries experiencing chronic water shortages (by 2025), 40 are either in the Middle East and North Africa or in sub-Saharan Africa. The 20 countries of the Middle East and North Africa face the worst prospects. Worldwide demand for water tripled during the past century, and is presently doubling every 21 years. Clearly, such demand is unsustainable in the long term and will require dramatic new approaches to water resources management to avoid the worst of the looming crisis.


Some would ask how a planet that has 70 percent of its surface covered with water could face a water crisis. More than 97 percent of that water is ocean water. Of the remaining three percent, about three-quarters is locked away in ice caps or glaciers, and is thus unavailable. In truth, slightly less than one one-hundredth of one percent of the world’s total supply of water is easily accessible as lakes, rivers, and shallow groundwater sources that are renewed by snow and rainfall. Water scarcity is further compounded by the disparity between where human populations are located and when and where rainfall and runoff occurs. Viewed in this manner, 81 percent of total global runoff is within geographic reach for human use, but three-quarters of that comes as floodwater and therefore is not accessible on demand.

Stop pretending and stop scaring in order to set up the replacement sham Military Industrial Complex for oil.

The pretend argument arises when countries like the United Arab Emirates not only use desalination, but use the latest kinds of plants. Or, USAID can pretend like the USA does and cause a crisis that needs even more costly repair.

Do the bureaucrats believe that the world is going to listen to 100 years of a "water weapon" next so that new generations of their Saxon and Visigoth families can steal and pillage ? I don't think so.

It's not over yet. It's all about faction.

SPQR

No comments: