WV1K: America's secret plan to create a new enemy using its own materiel

Monday, March 07, 2011

America's secret plan to create a new enemy using its own materiel

Every time the USA directly violates the wishes of George Washington and Dwight D. Eisenhower on behalf of Boeing, Lockheed, Pratt and Whitney, Colt's and the rest for their foreign parts suppliers, the US creates a new enemy.

Oh, at first it might look noble and democratic to a useful idiot.

In reality, it's pouring gasoline on a fire. They make money by sending arms. They make money by driving up oil through feigned panic. They make money by doing nothing and feigning insecurity and driving up oil prices. Globalists win no matter what they do.

As this is being written early Monday morning, crude oil is already up $1.50 in the start of trading.

Anyone trained in the field who is becoming bored knows that this is as remedial a stage as Octavian making the mistake of trusting Visigoths, a fact I'll readily admit.

We did it to ourselves, and were decimated for it to the tune of Legions XVII, XVIII and XIX and their supporters on 11 September 9, even if it was abject German treachery and treason and a conspiracy in place to this day as Bilderberg and the other Visigoth descendant member groups.

So we see it again as we did with the Mujahideen, which begot the Taliban, which begot the artificial construct known as al Qaida. This is despite recent lies in the media that the USA didn't create any of them. Most Americans seem to remember someone fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan and shooting down Soviet helicopters with deadly accuracy after a fashion.

Kept eating, nothing is going on. Go back to your XBOX 360 and let us govern worst, who governs most.

Desperate to avoid US military involvement in Libya in the event of a prolonged struggle between the Gaddafi regime and its opponents, theAmericans have asked Saudi Arabia if it can supply weapons to the rebels in Benghazi. The Saudi Kingdom, already facing a "day of rage" from its 10 per cent Shia Muslim community on Friday, with a ban on all demonstrations, has so far failed to respond to Washington's highly classified request, although King Abdullah personally loathes the Libyan leader, who tried to assassinate him just over a year ago.

Washington's request is in line with other US military co-operation with the Saudis. The royal family in Jeddah, which was deeply involved in the Contra scandal during the Reagan administration, gave immediate support to American efforts to arm guerrillas fighting the Soviet army in Afghanistan in 1980 and later – to America's chagrin – also funded and armed the Taliban.

Once again Washington wishes to commit the extraordinarily stupid move of arming rebels with RPGs and surface to air missiles, sometimes known as MANPADs.

Ca-ching. Operators are standing by to take your orders on credit.

The Saudis have been told that opponents of Gaddafi need anti-tank rockets and mortars as a first priority to hold off attacks by Gaddafi's armour, and ground-to-air missiles to shoot down his fighter-bombers.

Time after time these toys are then turned on US troops acting as policemen because the only person an Muslim hates more than his American Imperial Globalist puppet leader, is an American in his country. We saw this in Somalia in the events made famous as Blackhawk Down, in case you were asleep and missed the actual debacle. We saw this in Iraq when the leadership started telling the US to leave, and then started acting like Saddam by hosing citizens ad rounding up intellectuals last week. That's your favorite college professor, if you're an American reader...

And based on actual footage and not the old WHAM nonsense, we see it in all those smiling citizens of Afghanistan on 60 Minutes. Not.

And why shouldn't the Arab or Afghan hate the policeman of the world. For starters, many are policemen and they're in their country handing out the "tickets" to justify their second salary as National Guardsmen and Reservists.

Further, the American Globalists on the false Left (ever choose to eat dinner with anyone you don't like ?) are always late to the party to remove their previous Globalist endorsed puppet after setting the date and place as we saw with Wikileaks.

They like to let the "rebels," "insurgents," and "freedom fighters" twist in the wind a bit before acting. After all, "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter," as Reagan most recently said on 31 May 1986.

Of course, John Ashcroft did declare on 10 February 2003 in a public response to a comment made in a private email that "I totally reject the idea that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter," because he was so much more wise than Reagan.

Then again, they weren't show tune composer Ashcroft freedom fighters, they were Reagan's.

Rome already took all these missteps. What's more, we took them in Creta et Cyrenaica.

And we withdrew, and we withdrew, and we withdrew until we were invaded and destroyed in 476 under a concurrent coup d'etat that murdered two Emperors of the Goths own choosing that brought this Globalist order to its ultimate power today.

It's why I'm writing this and not sitting in the Roman Senate right now, or higher, along with 2500 others.

What goes around, comes around.

Wake up America.

SPQR

Stop adding little errors, eaters.

No comments:

O puer, qui omnia nomini debes

This blog is written in the unvarnished truth by an Ottaviano. That's Octavianus, Octavian, Octavius, Octavia, Octavii... some intel nit wit keeps editing the commonly used Wikipedia as Google and Youtube delinks Ottaviano and Octavianus, etc, out of their abject fear of real history. Now they've shoved Cardinal Ottaviani who worked with the OSS and Martin S. Quigley to the back of the searches too. Their goal is to throw off any casual looker seeking to confirm this. It's not the politically correct nonsense of a Globalist publishing house with a post-WWII agenda of anti-Roman, anti-Italian, and anti-Goyim lies.

I graduated Phi Beta Kappa with Honors in History from Trinity College and needed only a second thesis or exam to get the B.A. in Political Science or International Relations. I was oddly told that they were "redundant" even though many now get both. I then refused to become a sock puppet like others are, and was maimed on purpose to a near heart transplant, nerve damage, and internal bleeding by a bunch of Globalist government paranoids acting through Merck. Their Germanic and Jewish ancestors rioted against my family in Rome with this purpose, assassinated lawful Emperors and defiled the Mausoleum of Augustus in Rome. Stop believing what you were conditioned to think out of post WWII guilt. Nero didn't burn Rome; the fiddle they now say he played wasn't invented until the 16th century, and Nero was assassinated by their ancestors ending our rule. An unlawful coup took hold in 476 and continues unchallenged.

After all of that, on 31 May 2008, my 62 year old father dropped dead in front of me as two fighters hundreds of miles from their base flew over. Connecticut politicians Richard Blumenthal, Joe Courtney and my father's student Susan Bysiewicz held up both the ambulance and AED which should have been 1000 feet away for their own paranoid protection. That left my mother with $62 a month and no pension. You bet it was retaliation by the people who maimed me that I now attack, but hadn't uttered a word about until after that.

I'm also a ham radio operator, but most of the new hams are incompetent un-opinionated fake emergency responder mush mouths since they dropped the IQ test.

Benjamin Disraeli

"There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House ... I mean the secret societies.... It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe--the whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries--is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government; they do not want ameliorated institutions ... they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments. Some of them may go further...."

in the House of Commons, July 14, 1856

Nicolo Machiavelli

"Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you."

John Locke

"but where no such appeal is, as in the state of nature, for want of positive laws, and judges with authority to appeal to, the state of war once begun, continues, with a right to the innocent party to destroy the other whenever he can, until the aggressor offers peace, and desires reconciliation on such terms as may repair any wrongs he has already done, and secure the innocent for the future; nay, where an appeal to the law, and constituted judges, lies open, but the remedy is denied by a manifest perverting of justice, and a barefaced wresting of the laws to protect or indemnify the violence or injuries of some men, or party of men, there it is hard to imagine any thing but a state of war: for wherever violence is used, and injury done, though by hands appointed to administer justice, it is still violence and injury, however coloured with the name, pretences, or forms of law, the end whereof being to protect and redress the innocent, by an unbiassed application of it, to all who are under it; wherever that is not bona fide done, war is made upon the sufferers, who having no appeal on earth to right them, they are left to the only remedy in such cases, an appeal to heaven."

The "innovative" electric car

MR. MAXIM," asked New Haven Carriage-Maker William Hooker Atwood in 1896, "do you want this carriage to look like a Western buggy-maker's job or do you want it to be a gentleman's carriage?" Answered Hiram Percy Maxim, builder of the Mark I Electric Phaeton: "Like a gentleman's carriage, Mr. Atwood." For almost half a century, the U.S. automobile was indeed a "gentleman's carriage," built for men and bought on the basis of its mechanical excellence, not its sculptured lines or pleasing colors.