Thursday, October 27, 2011

The Senate of the Roman Republic: addresses on the history of Roman Constitutionalism by Senator Robert C. Byrd

Obama stole $200 in August from me, descendant of the Octavii, maimed for life by Bormann Merck in October 1998 with cardiomyopathy, internal bleeding, neuropathy, vasculitis, and a near emergency heart transplant I missed only because of a slight improvement.

His fools stole from my stroke injured mother that $200 and $43 thereafter, as his own freeloader illegal alien aunt (to hell with his fraud amnesty for her) collects hers on time and to the penny.

His minions then gassed me into the hospital using high altitude spraying known as "chemtrails" by 7 October 2011, in retaliation for every word of documented truth written in this blog.

But now he has millions, nay billions for students who are bloody failures and has used an Executive Order to implement his sham. Executive Orders were never intended to circumvent Congress, but that's what they are being used for.

And while the Atlantic claims this tyrant can't be stopped and indeed might be right, to say that the savings are so small that it doesn't matter is hooey. It's hooey because the total will cost the taxpayers for other's mistakes, as it has repeatedly for 3 years.

Can an Executive Order Really Do This?

Some opponents of excessive executive power may question whether an executive order can really even accomplish these ends. The president is ordering a policy change for loan consolidation and changing the implementation date for previously passed legislation. Either of these actions could make for a really interesting court challenge, as both appear to stretch the limits of what an executive order was designed to do -- shouldn't Congress order such changes?

In practice, however, the orders will probably go through without challenge. First, it isn't clear that anyone who has standing to bring such a case to court would do so. The first measures may cost some private lenders some interest revenue, but they need to keep a conciliatory relationship with the government. The latter two measures would cost taxpayers. And even if such a challenge was brought, it could take the court a year or two to provide a final verdict. By then, unless a judge grants a temporary injunction, consolidation would already have occurred for most interested borrowers and the legislation's stated implementation date would already be past for the latter two aspects of Obama's effort.

They can't even pay their bill. They deserve no consideration other than to be told to stop taking vacations, drive cheaper and used cars, and work longer hours to pay. They refused to save or go where they could afford, their parents refused to save or send them where they could afford, and now he'll bail them out for votes. Then he can spend 4 more years giving contracts to MIC contractors for failures like the F-22, and bailing out businesses and banks.

He turned "community organizer", retaliated and stole $200 from a heart patient and a widowed stroke patient, but he has no difficulty buying off bloody imbeciles.

"Remember that thou too art mortal."

Let's turn to The Senate of the Roman Republic: addresses on the history of Roman Constitutionalism, by Robert C. Byrd.

This was presented in the 103d Congress, 2d Session as S. Con. Res. 68:


From page 163


From page 172


"Remember that thou too art mortal."

SPQR



No comments: