Wednesday, March 23, 2011

NASA: Small nuclear war could reverse 'global warming'...TEPCO delivers for you ?

I said "Beware the Ides of March," didn't I ?


Contradicting Barack Obama’s assertion last week that radiation from Japan’s stricken Fukushima nuclear plant would not even reach Hawaii, the mainland United States has been blanketed with radioactive Xenon 133 particles, while spent nuclear fuel pools at Fukushima have now reached boiling point and threaten to spew out more radioactive smoke.

Although health authorities insist that levels of the radionuclide Xenon 133 that have been measured are harmless, claims that such radiation would dissolve over the Pacific have been proven completely inaccurate. Indeed, the latest charts show that fallout from Fukushima will not just smother the United States, but most of the globe.

Next, in NASA: Small nuclear war could reverse 'global warming' , published on 1 March 2011, ten days before the 11 March earthquake in Japan we are given evidence of analysis that nuclear contamination in the form of smoke and haze from a limited nuclear exchange can cause a global temperature reduction. Last week I presented five ways to cause an earthquake as published in Wired a while back. I also presented former Secretary of Defense Cohen speaking in 1997 who said that countries could cause earthquakes.

The 1 March article from Helium on a small nuclear war days published ten days before the release of a now worldwide ongoing radioactive cloud states :

Nuclear winter versus global warming

Some scientists theorized that such a limited nuclear exchange might be sufficient to initiate enough climate cooling to reverse the effects of global warming, so NASA decided to test the probability of such an occurrence by creating a simulation using computer modeling.

NASA scientists worked with other institutions and created a hypothetical war between two countries lobbing the total equivalent of one hundred Hiroshima-type bombs. The resulting mega-tonnage of explosive was calculated at a mere three-hundredths of the estimated world nuclear arsenal.

The model revealed that the fire—originally predicted by Sagan in the last century—would choke the troposphere with about five million metric tons of black carbon. The saturated atmosphere, rising from solar heating, would drift in the upper reaches of the atmosphere diluting the light and heat of the sun and cooling the planet.

At a recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C., research physical scientist Luke Oman stated during a press briefing regarding the NASA research that "the effects would still be regarded as leading to unprecedented climate change."

GE and TEPCO are so hesitant to entomb the reactors in concrete. Why ? Part of it is insurance on the facilities. Lose the facility through natural causes, get the insurance. Part of it is proving to the insurers that they tried and tried but they just couldn't save the reactors. Part of it is an attempt to save the reactors as they've said... which is a farce. What sooty, soggy, wet electronics remnants would you save from a house fire ?

Given the Helium article, what's with the cloud of radioactive dust the world is now breathing for GE and TEPCO ?

SPQR

No comments: