A Motive: Norway Had Decided to Stop Bombing Libya August 1
The targets of the Norwegian terror attacks are all expressly political, including government offices and a summer youth camp of the ruling Labor Party, and thus point in the direction of politics. The government of Norway is currently a coalition composed of the Labor Party, the Socialist Left Party, and the Center Party. Norway has traditionally attempted to cultivate a pro-Arab foreign policy, as seen in its sponsorship of the Oslo peace accords between Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in the mid-1990s. The current government has announced its intention of granting diplomatic recognition to a Palestinian state in the near future. When the destabilization of Libya began last February, the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of the Labor Party warned Norway’s partners in the NATO alliance against getting involved.
But soon after this, Norway gave in to US pressure and agreed to participate in NATO’s bombing of Libya for an initial period of three months, sending six planes which have carried out an estimated 10% of all the bombing raids mounted by the Atlantic alliance. However, as the end of its three-month commitment had passed, Norway had reduced its contingent to four planes during the month of July, and had announced on June 10 that it was planning to withdraw altogether from the NATO bombing coalition no later than August 1.
The Norwegian decision to drop out of the NATO attack coalition was associated with a similar move by the Netherlands, which was announced on that same day of June 10. The Dutch had decided to maintain their contingent of six planes, but will no longer take part in bombing attacks on ground targets. Henceforth, the Dutch are willing only to help enforce the no-fly zone through air interdiction. There was therefore the potential that Norway’s example could trigger a general tendency by the smaller NATO states to quit the bombing coalition, in which their collective presence is highly significant.
That reminds me of when "Italy's" sham government of anti-Roman socialist usurpers decided that they wanted the bombing stopped; Hillary Clinton went bananas in front of the camera during a lapse of total control of events. She then reappeared steeled from a sham meeting held there.
Tarpley is likely on target, for NATO is a Nazi product.
A few days ago in Reichskommissariat Norwegen I noted the many early contradictions in the media reports about what the purported operative in Norway was being characterized as.
That is to say, at once a right-winger and yet an anti-Nazi.
Does this explain the rather odd response of the Norwegian Prime Minister of addressing operatives in the plural, when the world is told it was one man ?
"I have a message for those who attacked us, this is a message from all of Norway, you are not going to destroy us, you are not going to destroy our democracy..
"Nobody is going to bomb us into silence, nobody is going to shoot us into silence.
"Tomorrow we will show the world that the Norwegian democracy grows in strength when it matters..
"We must never stop standing up for our values. We must show that the Norwegian society can stand up to these testing times. We must show humanity, but not naivety."
That doesn't sound like he was addressing one farmer, now does it ?
Breivik outlines his UK links, claiming he met eight other extremists from across Europe in London in 2002 to "re-form" the Knights Templar Europe – a group whose purpose was "to seize political and military control of western European countries and implement a cultural conservative political agenda".
Oh, he probably met eight war mongers who egged him on, but they weren't who the Guardian says they were.
Only 9 more shopping days until August 2nd.
SPQR
No comments:
Post a Comment