WV1K: Government easing into next past violation of the Fourth Amendment

Monday, May 23, 2011

Government easing into next past violation of the Fourth Amendment

They eased into the intercepts of "terrorists" that morphed into foreign communications you were party to, and then that they just had the computers monitoring everyone because "your" family smashed planes into Manhattan that day and not the son of their business partners the bin Ladens as they tell us (sarcasm).

Now they're starting again, ever testing the water for a response.

Instead of just telling the public that after 9/11 they ran everyone's driver's license (besides their fugitives lie) and other government ID photo through facial recognition software and they now know everyone descended from everyone and related to everyone, they started the narrative with "bin Laden" being "identified" by it.

At each stage of their incompetence, no one is arrested. No one is fired. You just get watched more.

They're criminally and pathologically paranoid about who is who because of their own government, industrial and bank crime spree. In particular their handlers have warned them against anyone they killed or maimed (as idiotic as that is), and any old families they assassinated like the Julio-Claudians or Romanovs to remove the way they now don't want to be removed themselves. They got lucky when they killed the last Emperors, Julius Nepos and Romulus Augustus.

Remember, a world government brought to power by a coup d'etat over the Roman Empire that ruled a quarter of the world's people is the crime and the criminals, not those who used to rule and were reduced to servitude by it. The criminals destroyed Rome. All else is illegitimate.

Indeed, they began this one with this in New York after the recent bus crash, as if the two were connected when that wasn't the reason for the crash. Yet every unrelated event is cause to destroy your rights as they ignore murderous companies like Merck that weren't even dealt with after WWII before going on to maim and kill some more:

Every driver, commercial or noncommercial, who applies for a new license in New York State has his or her driver’s license photo run through the recognition program. In addition, the state is running old licenses and identity cards, a process it estimates to take close to three years.

The facial recognition software, which is produced by L-1 Identity Solutions, an identity technology company based in Stamford, Conn., performs a series of facial-feature measurements, analyzing the placement and size of the eyes, mouth, eyebrows, cheekbones and facial contours, and ultimately deduces a relation among those elements, which cannot be altered with makeup or facial hair.

That said, the recognition software is not perfect. Each match
generated by the software still has to be followed up with an
assessment by human eyes. “Some of the people were identical twins,”
said Jackie McGinnis, a spokesman for the D.M.V.

If it's not perfect then government is stealing from the public for their MIC cohorts by buying it. Corporations have no right to impoverish innocent people with needless legal fees because they're thieves and corporate liars.

Now they're conducting a staged "debate" featuring NSA and CIA / IN-Q-TEL funded government contractor Google to trickle out what else they've done:

The executive chairman of Google has warned governments against facial recognition technology - saying it is 'too creepy' even for the search engine.

Eric Schmidt said that the technology has advanced rapidly in recent years and that it could be rolled out across the internet.

But the controversial technique has angered privacy campaigners who claim that it would be a further erosion of privacy and civil liberties.

Now Schmidt has dispelled any suggestions that internet giant Google would be the first company to employ the system.

But he warned that there were likely to be other organisations who might 'cross the line' and use facial recognition.

Speaking today at Google's Big Tent conference on internet privacy, technology and society, in Hertfordshire, Schmidt said that the accuracy of such technology was 'very concerning'.

Facial recognition would work by scanning in a photograph of somebody's face in order to potentially reveal personal information about them.

Crime fighters argue that it could be used to trace suspects who have been recorded on CCTV. But civil liberties groups say it is an invasion of privacy.

Mr Schmidt said that Google, which has been criticised in the past for gathering information, was 'unlikely' to employ facial recognition programs.

Schmidt was responding to a question about coining the phrase 'crossing the creepy line' which he came up with for privacy issues.

But he said 'some company by the way is going to cross that line'. Commentators suggested that Schmidt may have been referring to Facebook.

Dominionists, eh ?

Run this one.

SPQR

No comments:

O puer, qui omnia nomini debes

This blog is written in the unvarnished truth by an Ottaviano. That's Octavianus, Octavian, Octavius, Octavia, Octavii... some intel nit wit keeps editing the commonly used Wikipedia as Google and Youtube delinks Ottaviano and Octavianus, etc, out of their abject fear of real history. Now they've shoved Cardinal Ottaviani who worked with the OSS and Martin S. Quigley to the back of the searches too. Their goal is to throw off any casual looker seeking to confirm this. It's not the politically correct nonsense of a Globalist publishing house with a post-WWII agenda of anti-Roman, anti-Italian, and anti-Goyim lies.

I graduated Phi Beta Kappa with Honors in History from Trinity College and needed only a second thesis or exam to get the B.A. in Political Science or International Relations. I was oddly told that they were "redundant" even though many now get both. I then refused to become a sock puppet like others are, and was maimed on purpose to a near heart transplant, nerve damage, and internal bleeding by a bunch of Globalist government paranoids acting through Merck. Their Germanic and Jewish ancestors rioted against my family in Rome with this purpose, assassinated lawful Emperors and defiled the Mausoleum of Augustus in Rome. Stop believing what you were conditioned to think out of post WWII guilt. Nero didn't burn Rome; the fiddle they now say he played wasn't invented until the 16th century, and Nero was assassinated by their ancestors ending our rule. An unlawful coup took hold in 476 and continues unchallenged.

After all of that, on 31 May 2008, my 62 year old father dropped dead in front of me as two fighters hundreds of miles from their base flew over. Connecticut politicians Richard Blumenthal, Joe Courtney and my father's student Susan Bysiewicz held up both the ambulance and AED which should have been 1000 feet away for their own paranoid protection. That left my mother with $62 a month and no pension. You bet it was retaliation by the people who maimed me that I now attack, but hadn't uttered a word about until after that.

I'm also a ham radio operator, but most of the new hams are incompetent un-opinionated fake emergency responder mush mouths since they dropped the IQ test.

Benjamin Disraeli

"There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House ... I mean the secret societies.... It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe--the whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries--is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government; they do not want ameliorated institutions ... they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments. Some of them may go further...."

in the House of Commons, July 14, 1856

Nicolo Machiavelli

"Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you."

John Locke

"but where no such appeal is, as in the state of nature, for want of positive laws, and judges with authority to appeal to, the state of war once begun, continues, with a right to the innocent party to destroy the other whenever he can, until the aggressor offers peace, and desires reconciliation on such terms as may repair any wrongs he has already done, and secure the innocent for the future; nay, where an appeal to the law, and constituted judges, lies open, but the remedy is denied by a manifest perverting of justice, and a barefaced wresting of the laws to protect or indemnify the violence or injuries of some men, or party of men, there it is hard to imagine any thing but a state of war: for wherever violence is used, and injury done, though by hands appointed to administer justice, it is still violence and injury, however coloured with the name, pretences, or forms of law, the end whereof being to protect and redress the innocent, by an unbiassed application of it, to all who are under it; wherever that is not bona fide done, war is made upon the sufferers, who having no appeal on earth to right them, they are left to the only remedy in such cases, an appeal to heaven."

The "innovative" electric car

MR. MAXIM," asked New Haven Carriage-Maker William Hooker Atwood in 1896, "do you want this carriage to look like a Western buggy-maker's job or do you want it to be a gentleman's carriage?" Answered Hiram Percy Maxim, builder of the Mark I Electric Phaeton: "Like a gentleman's carriage, Mr. Atwood." For almost half a century, the U.S. automobile was indeed a "gentleman's carriage," built for men and bought on the basis of its mechanical excellence, not its sculptured lines or pleasing colors.