Thursday, November 17, 2011

Two thousand years of complaining


A vandal altered a sign at a subway station in a heavily Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn to make it read "Avenue Jew," according to Assemblyman Dov Hikind. A subway rider saw the graffiti, photographed it, and contacted Hikind's office...

Police removed the sign and are investigating it as a possible bias incident, according to a news release from Hikind's office. But the NYPD has not confirmed that information.

"Education and vigilance are our only weapons in fighting against this blatant hatred," the Brooklyn Democrat said in a statement. "We must send a message to those who perpetrate these vile acts that we will not tolerate their behavior. These cowards need to know that we will find them wherever they lurk, and when we do, we will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law."

Oh boo hoo. Why don't you shut up or go ask the Rothschilds to protect you from paint and words ?

We're all quite sick of you after 2000 years.

I wish to report the assassination of the Emperors Julius Caesar and Nero Caesar by certain Jews whose families still exist and parlayed it into massive control and wealth today.

I wish to report 2000 years of derogatory lies about my family in the face of all contemporary historians about the murders of both men and the causes (retaking the coinage of money from the Jews by Caesar and invasion of Judaea by Nero), as well as repeated sackings of Rome that their bankers financed.

I wish to report the defacement of the Mausoleum of Augustus in 410 by dumping their remains in the streets like they were animals.

Is Israel going to invite me there to take a statement from me ?

The real Nero, and not a corporate lie is seen in Tacitus' Annals 15.39 that states:

Nero at this time was at Antium, and did not return to Rome until the fire approached his house, which he had built to connect the palace with the gardens of Maecenas. It could not, however, be stopped from devouring the palace, the house, and everything around it. However, to relieve the people, driven out homeless as they were, he threw open to them the Campus Martius and the public buildings of Agrippa, and even his own gardens, and raised temporary structures to receive the destitute multitude. Supplies of food were brought up from Ostia and the neighbouring towns, and the price of corn was reduced to three sesterces a peck. These acts, though popular, produced no effect, since a rumour had gone forth everywhere that, at the very time when the city was in flames, the emperor appeared on a private stage and sang of the destruction of Troy, comparing present misfortunes with the calamities of antiquity.

Nero didn't start a fire. He didn't play an instrument not invented until the Rothschilds appeared in the 16th century. He didn't function as a tyrant by providing shelter to thousands in his own facilities.

From William Smith's A dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology written in 1873 before the unfortunate matters of WWII and the subsequent guilt conditioning of the planet in favor of Jews, and speaking of the fire (let alone the fiddle that wasn't invented until the 16th century) we see:

The origin of the dreadful conflagration at Rome (A. D. 64) is uncertain. It is hardly credible that the city was fired by Nero's order, though Dion and Suetonius both attest the fact, but these writers are always ready to believe a scandalous tale. Tacitus (Tac. Ann. 15.38) leaves the matter doubtful. The fire originated in that part of the circus which is contiguous to the Caelian and Palatine hills, and of the fourteen regiones of Rome three were totally destroyed, and in seven others only a few halfburnt houses remained. A prodigious quantity of property and valuable works of art were burnt, and many lives were lost. The emperor set about rebuilding the city on an improved plan, with wider streets, though it is doubtful if the salubrity of Rome was improved by widening the streets and making the houses lower, for there was less protection against the heat.

We can see the stories of Suetonius, born after Nero died and writing decades later.

Yet there were some who for a long time decorated his tomb with spring and summer flowers, and now produced his statues on the rostra in the fringed toga, and now his edicts, as if he were still alive and would shortly return and deal destruction to his enemies. Nay more, Vologaesus, king of the Parthians, when he sent envoys to the senate to renew his alliance, earnestly begged this too, that honour be paid to the memory of Nero. In fact, twenty years later, when I was a young man, a person of obscure origin appeared, who gave out that he was Nero, and the name was still in such favour with the Parthians that they supported him vigorously and surrendered him with great reluctance.

That's not the part that the media chants, and they fall apart when again compared to just this one source written before the Politically Correct era:

In his youth Nero was instructed in all the liberal knowledge of the time except philosophy; and he was turned from the study of the old Roman orators by his master Seneca. Accordingly, he applied himself to poetry, and Suetonius says that his verses were not made for him, as some suppose, for the biographer had seen and examined some of Nero's writing-tablets and small books, in which the writing was in his own hand, with many erasures and cancellings and interlineations. He had also skill in painting and modelling. Though profuse and fond of pomp and splendour, Nero had apparently some taste. The Apollo Belvedere and the Fighting Gladiator, as it is called, by Agasias, were found in the ruins of a villa at Antium, which is conjectured to have belonged to Nero. (See Thiersch, Ueber die Epochen der Bildenden Kunst, &c. p. 312, 2d ed.)

Everybody gets the shit knocked out of them. Most don't destroy Empires and then cause the murder of millions of innocents and soldiers again repeatedly throughout history.

Shut up and stop complaining about words and paint !

SPQR

No comments: