Saturday, April 02, 2011

NATO kills 13 rebels; chances are good they were al Qaida targets

As many outlets have been tracking, NATO is attacking Gaddafi on behalf of al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb. NATO itself admitted this last week.

As presented previously, the USA is at de facto Civil War, with factions attacking factions as they did in the Battle of the Manhattan Forest on 11 September 2001, in a ongoing Germanic coup against Rome which began on 11 September 9.

The ancestors of today's Bilderberg globalists and well known financier and other coup plotters overthrew the lawful Roman Empire in 476. Now they seek to overthrow the United States for globalism Rome already gave them... just not under their control and profit.

Despite nine years of propaganda and war and security theater, the USA dba NATO is now attacking al Qaida in Iraq and Afghanistan and the USA dba NATO is defending al Qaida in Libya. What's wrong here ?

One would rightly ask, despite weapons frequently being fired in celebration in Libya and the Middle East, why the rebels fired at an A-10 and why the A-10 fired at the rebels it's "aiding" ! Doesn't this story fall apart thanks to its swiss cheese logic ?


Most blamed a Tripoli agent for drawing the "friendly fire." "Some of Gaddafi's forces sneaked in among the rebels and fired anti-aircraft guns in the air," said rebel fighter Mustafa Ali Omar. "After that the NATO forces came and bombed them."

Disinformation Account Version One. The Boogeyman did it.

But some gave a different account. "The rebels shot up in the air and the alliance came and bombed them. We are the ones who made the mistake," said a fighter who did not give his name.

Disinformation Account Version Two. A fool did it.

The strike killed 13 rebels and wounded seven, rebel spokesman Hafiz Ghoga said, calling it a "regrettable incident."

Drudge says they were killed "accidentally".
This is highly unlikely given at least two different stories and a sustained back and forth engagement.

It's highly unlikely that NATO is operating anywhere in the world without the ability to identify supposed Friend and Foe.

"The military leadership is working on ways to prevent a recurrence," he told reporters in Benghazi.

Shooting at the planes providing air cover would be a good start. There's something wrong here, folks.

Another rebel spokesman, Mustafa Gheriani, told Reuters the leadership still wanted and needed allied air strikes. "You have to look at the big picture. Mistakes will happen. We are trying to get rid of Gaddafi and there will be casualties, although of course it does not make us happy."

A NATO pilot decided he wasn't going to tolerate al Qaida fighters shooting at him, no matter his orders to aid them.

In Brussels a spokeswoman for NATO, which this week assumed command of the military operation launched on March 19, declined to say whether its forces were involved in the Brega incident.

"We are looking into the report," said spokeswoman Oana Lungescu. "However, if someone fires at our aircraft, they have the right to protect themselves."

Similarly, Gaddafi who said the rebels are al Qaida, had his state run media declare that:

coalition forces bombarded "civilian and military locations" in western Libya late on Friday. The strikes were in the towns of Khoms, between the capital Tripoli and Misrata, and Arrujban, in the southwest.

Showing footage of two men receiving medical treatment while lying in hospital beds, it said, "This is the result of attacks by crusader aggressors in Khoms."

Something is rotten in Creta et Cyrenaica. The A-10 attacked those attacking it.

SPQR

No comments: